Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another FoF Overseas fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore | Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of | Axis Greater China Equity Fund of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shoreFoF Overseas | itself | Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore and Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore | Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore |
| Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund ofFoF Overseas | Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of and Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore | itself | Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of share 0% of their portfolios |
| Axis Greater China Equity Fund ofFoF Overseas | Axis Greater China Equity Fund of and Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore | Axis Greater China Equity Fund of and Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of Fund and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund, share 0% — not one holding in common. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore | Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of | Axis Greater China Equity Fund of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Overseas | FoF Overseas | FoF Overseas |
| Fund house | Edelweiss Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 42% of 83 | 95% of 37 | 6% of 32 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.02% points | 1.14% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | 24.4% | 18.5% | 22.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 25.6% | 24.1% | 23.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.6% | 15.5% | 8.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −18.9% | −22.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3,116 Cr | ₹2,292 Cr | ₹3,839 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 5.5 yrs | 5.2 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 3 · 100% | 3 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.