Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each other	Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore	Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shoreFoF Overseas	itself	Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore and Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore not disclosed
Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund ofFoF Overseas	Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of and Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore not disclosed	itself

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

Measure	Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore	Axis Global Equity Alpha Fund of
Category	FoF Overseas	FoF Overseas
Fund house	Edelweiss Asset Management Limited	Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4	42% of 83	95% of 37
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5	1.02% points	1.14% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1	not measured	not measured
Run by P7	not known	not known
1-year return	24.4%	18.5%
3 years p.a.	25.6%	24.1%
5 years p.a.	6.6%	15.5%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)	−20.9%	−18.9%
Assets (AUM)	₹3,116 Cr	₹2,292 Cr
Disclosed history	—	5.5 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight	none disclosed	3 · 100%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.