Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Axis Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Axis Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Axis Small CapSmall Cap | Axis Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Axis Small Cap and Tata Value share 4% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Axis Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Tata Value share 17% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Axis Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap fund share 24% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Axis Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Small Cap | Flexi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 42% of 109 | 96% of 27 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.44% points | 1.28% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 63% | 52% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 10.0% | 3.8% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 16.4% | 15.0% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −19.4% | −19.7% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹27,535 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 132 · 25% | 80 · 45% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.