Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Quant Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and UTI Value share 11% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Quant Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 30% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Multi Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 30% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 109 | 50% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% points | 0.84% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 88% | 66% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.9% | −1.4% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.5% | 13.5% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.7% | 16.4% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −25.3% | −18.6% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 6.9 yrs | 14 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 74 · 53% | 123 · 29% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.