ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherQuant Multi CapUTI Value
Quant Multi CapMulti Cap
itself
Quant Multi Cap and UTI Value share 11% of their portfolios
UTI ValueValue
UTI Value and Quant Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Quant Multi Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 11% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureQuant Multi CapUTI Value
CategoryMulti CapValue
Fund housequant Money Managers LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P473% of 10937% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.93% points0.79% points
Portfolio turned over a year P188%47%
Run by P7Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrsAmit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs
1-year return4.9%−4.1%
3 years p.a.10.5%12.1%
5 years p.a.11.7%11.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−25.3%−17.2%
Assets (AUM)₹7,717 Cr₹9,603 Cr
Disclosed history6.9 yrs12 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight74 · 53%71 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.