Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Bandhan Contra | Motilal Oswal Contra | |
|---|---|---|
| Bandhan Contra | itself | 4% |
| Motilal Oswal Contra | 4% | itself |
Most alike: Bandhan Contra Fund and Motilal Oswal Contra Fund share 4% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Contra | Motilal Oswal Contra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Contra | Contra |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 392% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Bhalchandra Shinde · 4 mo |
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3 years p.a. | — | — |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −3.0% | −3.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,713 Cr | ₹393 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1 mo | 4 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 39 · 130% | 40 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.