Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Tata Multi Sector Passive FOF | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tata Multi Sector Passive FOF | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Tata Multi Sector Passive FOF and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Multi Sector Passive FOF | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Domestic | FoF Domestic |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 78% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.93% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Nikunj Kumar Singhal · 1 mo | Manish Bhantia · 9.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | — | 1.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 10.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 10.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −5.2% | −7.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹84 Cr | ₹28,825 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2 mo | 7.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 12 · 100% | 31 · 66% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.