Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mirae Asset Nifty Top 20 Equal Weight ETF | UTI Nifty 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Nifty Top 20 Equal Weight ETF | itself | 58% |
| UTI Nifty 50 ETF | 58% | itself |
Most alike: Mirae Asset Nifty Top 20 Equal Weight ETF and UTI Nifty 50 ETF share 58% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Nifty Top 20 Equal Weight ETF | UTI Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Equity ETF | Equity ETF |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 58% of 97 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 49% | 31% |
| Run by P7 | Ritesh Patel · 1.1 yrs | Sharwan Kumar Goyal · 8.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | — | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | −50.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | −32.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.0% | −90.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹15 Cr | ₹72,214 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 9 mo | 4.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 22 · 54% | 51 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.