Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Groww Multi Asset Allocation | DSP Multi Asset Allocation | |
|---|---|---|
| Groww Multi Asset Allocation | itself | 0% |
| DSP Multi Asset Allocation | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Groww Multi Asset Allocation Fund and DSP Multi Asset Allocation Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Groww Multi Asset Allocation | DSP Multi Asset Allocation |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Asset Allocation | Multi Asset Allocation |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 100% of 1 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 1.50% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 40% |
| Run by P7 | Kaustubh Sule · 1.0 yrs | Aparna Karnik · ≥ 1.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.3% | 12.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 18.7% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −12.4% | −9.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹391 Cr | ₹10,882 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1 mo | 2.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 7 · 100% | 108 · 60% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.