Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| SBI Nifty100 Low Volatility 30 Index | SBI NIFTY INDEX | |
|---|---|---|
| SBI Nifty100 Low Volatility 30 Index | itself | 49% |
| SBI NIFTY INDEX | 49% | itself |
Most alike: SBI Nifty100 Low Volatility 30 Index Fund and SBI NIFTY INDEX FUND share 49% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI Nifty100 Low Volatility 30 Index | SBI NIFTY INDEX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Index Funds | Index Funds |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.37% | 0.41% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 48% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Viral Chhadva · 1.1 yrs | Viral Chhadva · 7 mo |
| 1-year return | −4.7% | −6.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 6.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 6.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.3% | −15.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹57 Cr | ₹13,913 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1.2 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 32 · 37% | 53 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.