Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Nifty 500 Quality 50 Index | UTI Nifty 50 Index | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Nifty 500 Quality 50 Index | itself | 9% |
| UTI Nifty 50 Index | 9% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Nifty 500 Quality 50 Index Fund and UTI Nifty 50 Index Fund share 9% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Nifty 500 Quality 50 Index | UTI Nifty 50 Index |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Index Funds | Index Funds |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 79% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.54% | 0.11% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 75% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Jitendra Tolani · 1.3 yrs | Sharwan Kumar Goyal · 8.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | −3.7% | −6.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 6.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 6.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.8% | −15.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹44 Cr | ₹29,204 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1.3 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 52 · 40% | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.