Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mirae Asset Long Term | Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term | |
|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Long Term | itself | 0% |
| Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Mirae Asset Long Term Fund and Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Long Term | Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Long Term | Long Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 79% of 14 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.52% | 0.34% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Kruti Chheta · 1.8 yrs | Pranay Sinha · 5.4 yrs |
| 1-year return | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 6.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 5.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −5.6% | −5.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹18 Cr | ₹6,547 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1.8 yrs | 7.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 8 · 100% | 19 · 98% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.