Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mirae Asset Nifty Metal ETF | UTI Nifty 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Nifty Metal ETF | itself | 5% |
| UTI Nifty 50 ETF | 5% | itself |
Most alike: Mirae Asset Nifty Metal ETF and UTI Nifty 50 ETF share 5% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Nifty Metal ETF | UTI Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Equity ETF | Equity ETF |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 58% of 97 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 43% | 31% |
| Run by P7 | Akshay Udeshi · 2.0 yrs | Sharwan Kumar Goyal · 8.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | 30.1% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | −50.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | −32.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.3% | −90.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹543 Cr | ₹72,214 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1.9 yrs | 4.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 17 · 86% | 51 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.