Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Baroda BNP Paribas Dividend Yield | HDFC DIVIDEND YIELD | |
|---|---|---|
| Baroda BNP Paribas Dividend Yield | itself | 36% |
| HDFC DIVIDEND YIELD | 36% | itself |
Most alike: Baroda BNP Paribas Dividend Yield Fund and HDFC DIVIDEND YIELD FUND share 36% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Baroda BNP Paribas Dividend Yield | HDFC DIVIDEND YIELD |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dividend Yield | Dividend Yield |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 32% of 34 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 39% |
| Run by P7 | Himanshu Singh · ≥ 1.8 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 1.4% | −7.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 6.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 8.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.1% | −27.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹606 Cr | ₹5,659 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.0 yrs | 2.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 47 · 42% | 130 · 31% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.