ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Motilal Oswal Quant FundSectoral/ Thematic×
  • HDFC Defence FundSectoral/ Thematic×
  • ICICI Prudential Technology FundSectoral/ Thematic×
  • ICICI Prudential Business Cycle FundSectoral/ Thematic×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherMotilal Oswal QuantHDFC DefenceICICI Prudential TechnologyICICI Prudential Business Cycle
Motilal Oswal QuantSectoral/ Thematic
itself
Motilal Oswal Quant and HDFC Defence share 7% of their portfolios
Motilal Oswal Quant and ICICI Prudential Technology share 8% of their portfolios
Motilal Oswal Quant and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle share 3% of their portfolios
HDFC DefenceSectoral/ Thematic
HDFC Defence and Motilal Oswal Quant share 7% of their portfolios
itself
HDFC Defence and ICICI Prudential Technology share 1% of their portfolios
HDFC Defence and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle share 2% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential TechnologySectoral/ Thematic
ICICI Prudential Technology and Motilal Oswal Quant share 8% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Technology and HDFC Defence share 1% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Technology and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle share 6% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Business CycleSectoral/ Thematic
ICICI Prudential Business Cycle and Motilal Oswal Quant share 3% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Business Cycle and HDFC Defence share 2% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Business Cycle and ICICI Prudential Technology share 6% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Motilal Oswal Quant Fund and ICICI Prudential Technology Fund, share 8%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureMotilal Oswal QuantHDFC DefenceICICI Prudential TechnologyICICI Prudential Business Cycle
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
Fund houseMotilal Oswal Asset Management Company LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4not measured100% of 458% of 109100% of 33
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.15% points1.53% points0.98% points1.36% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1283%59%61%52%
Run by P7Ajay Khandelwal · 2.3 yrsnot knownVaibhav Dusad · 6.3 yrsManish Banthia · 5.7 yrs
1-year return−2.8%22.4%−12.1%−3.9%
3 years p.a.—38.2%5.3%14.8%
5 years p.a.——3.4%14.9%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−26.7%−34.5%−28.0%−14.4%
Assets (AUM)₹256 Cr₹11,252 Cr₹13,677 Cr₹16,090 Cr
Disclosed history2.3 yrs2.4 yrs13 yrs5.7 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight28 · 40%26 · 80%71 · 54%88 · 51%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.