Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Sectoral/ Thematic fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Motilal Oswal Quant | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services | ICICI Prudential India Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal QuantSectoral/ Thematic | itself | Motilal Oswal Quant and ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services share 4% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Quant and ICICI Prudential India Opportunities share 2% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial ServicesSectoral/ Thematic | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services and Motilal Oswal Quant share 4% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services and ICICI Prudential India Opportunities share 34% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential India OpportunitiesSectoral/ Thematic | ICICI Prudential India Opportunities and Motilal Oswal Quant share 2% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential India Opportunities and ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services share 34% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services Fund and ICICI Prudential India Opportunities Fund share 34% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Motilal Oswal Quant | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services | ICICI Prudential India Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| Fund house | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 35% of 109 | 100% of 57 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.15% points | 1.08% points | 1.47% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 283% | 75% | 76% |
| Run by P7 | Ajay Khandelwal · 2.3 yrs | Antariksha Banerjee · 7 mo | Roshan Chutkey · 7.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | −2.2% | −0.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 9.8% | 13.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 9.7% | 16.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −26.7% | −17.0% | −13.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹256 Cr | ₹11,267 Cr | ₹38,633 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.3 yrs | 13 yrs | 7.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 28 · 40% | 59 · 63% | 80 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.