ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

3 of 6 chosen

  • Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index FundIndex Funds · no portfolio disclosed×
  • SBI NIFTY INDEX FUNDIndex Funds×
  • ICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 Index FundIndex Funds×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherEdelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 IndexSBI NIFTY INDEXICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 Index
Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 IndexIndex Funds
itself
Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index and SBI NIFTY INDEX: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index
Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index and ICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 Index: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index
SBI NIFTY INDEXIndex Funds
SBI NIFTY INDEX and Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index
itself
SBI NIFTY INDEX and ICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 Index share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 IndexIndex Funds
ICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 Index and Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index
ICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 Index and SBI NIFTY INDEX share 0% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, SBI NIFTY INDEX FUND and ICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 Index Fund, share 0% — not one holding in common. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Edelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 Index has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureEdelweiss Nifty Alpha Low Volatility 30 IndexSBI NIFTY INDEXICICI Prudential Nifty Next 50 Index
CategoryIndex FundsIndex FundsIndex Funds
Fund houseEdelweiss Asset Management LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4not measured53% of 10951% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.71% points0.41% points0.46% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured32%58%
Run by P7not knownViral Chhadva · 7 moNishit Patel · 5.7 yrs
1-year return−1.9%−6.3%3.5%
3 years p.a.—6.8%17.2%
5 years p.a.—6.9%11.7%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−24.9%−15.5%−26.7%
Assets (AUM)₹97 Cr₹13,913 Cr₹10,132 Cr
Disclosed history—5.8 yrs10 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed53 · 53%52 · 34%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.