Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| PGIM India Retirement | UTI Retirement | |
|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Retirement | itself | 0% |
| UTI Retirement | 0% | itself |
Most alike: PGIM India Retirement Fund and UTI Retirement Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | PGIM India Retirement | UTI Retirement |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retirement | Retirement |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 17% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.73% | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 23% |
| Run by P7 | not known | V Srivatsa · 17 yrs |
| 1-year return | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 8.7% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 8.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.5% | −6.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹98 Cr | ₹4,714 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 124 · 42% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.