Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| BANDHAN LONG TERM | ICICI Prudential Long Term | |
|---|---|---|
| BANDHAN LONG TERM | itself | 10% |
| ICICI Prudential Long Term | 10% | itself |
Most alike: BANDHAN LONG TERM FUND and ICICI Prudential Long Term Fund share 10% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | BANDHAN LONG TERM | ICICI Prudential Long Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Long Term | Long Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 100% of 14 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.42% | 0.70% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Gautam · 5 mo | Manish Banthia · 2.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.9% | 2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 6.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 5.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −4.6% | −3.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹54 Cr | ₹843 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.4 yrs | 1 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 8 · 100% | 21 · 87% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.