ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • quant PSU FundSectoral/ Thematic×
  • ICICI Prudential Business Cycle FundSectoral/ Thematic×
  • ICICI Prudential Technology FundSectoral/ Thematic×
  • HDFC Manufacturing FundSectoral/ Thematic×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherquant PSUICICI Prudential Business CycleICICI Prudential TechnologyHDFC Manufacturing
quant PSUSectoral/ Thematic
itself
quant PSU and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle share 0% of their portfolios
quant PSU and ICICI Prudential Technology share 0% of their portfolios
quant PSU and HDFC Manufacturing share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Business CycleSectoral/ Thematic
ICICI Prudential Business Cycle and quant PSU share 0% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Business Cycle and ICICI Prudential Technology share 6% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Business Cycle and HDFC Manufacturing share 18% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential TechnologySectoral/ Thematic
ICICI Prudential Technology and quant PSU share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Technology and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle share 6% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Technology and HDFC Manufacturing share 1% of their portfolios
HDFC ManufacturingSectoral/ Thematic
HDFC Manufacturing and quant PSU share 0% of their portfolios
HDFC Manufacturing and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle share 18% of their portfolios
HDFC Manufacturing and ICICI Prudential Technology share 1% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Business Cycle Fund and HDFC Manufacturing Fund share 18% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

Measurequant PSUICICI Prudential Business CycleICICI Prudential TechnologyHDFC Manufacturing
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
Fund housequant Money Managers LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4not measured100% of 3358% of 109not measured
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.42% points1.36% points0.98% points1.14% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1239%52%61%59%
Run by P7Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.3 yrsManish Banthia · 5.7 yrsVaibhav Dusad · 6.3 yrsnot known
1-year return4.2%−3.9%−12.1%7.0%
3 years p.a.—14.8%5.3%—
5 years p.a.—14.9%3.4%—
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−31.1%−14.4%−28.0%−21.5%
Assets (AUM)₹450 Cr₹16,090 Cr₹13,677 Cr₹10,759 Cr
Disclosed history2.4 yrs5.7 yrs13 yrs2.3 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight23 · 97%88 · 51%71 · 54%94 · 34%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.