Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Sectoral/ Thematic fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | quant PSU | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services | ICICI Prudential Technology |
|---|---|---|---|
| quant PSUSectoral/ Thematic | itself | quant PSU and ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services share 4% of their portfolios | quant PSU and ICICI Prudential Technology share 0% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial ServicesSectoral/ Thematic | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services and quant PSU share 4% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services and ICICI Prudential Technology share 2% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential TechnologySectoral/ Thematic | ICICI Prudential Technology and quant PSU share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Technology and ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services share 2% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, quant PSU Fund and ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services Fund, share 4%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | quant PSU | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services | ICICI Prudential Technology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 35% of 109 | 58% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.42% points | 1.08% points | 0.98% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 239% | 75% | 61% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.3 yrs | Antariksha Banerjee · 7 mo | Vaibhav Dusad · 6.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.2% | −2.2% | −12.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 9.8% | 5.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 9.7% | 3.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −31.1% | −17.0% | −28.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹450 Cr | ₹11,267 Cr | ₹13,677 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.4 yrs | 13 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 23 · 97% | 59 · 63% | 71 · 54% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.