Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| LIC MF Nifty Midcap 100 ETF | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| LIC MF Nifty Midcap 100 ETF | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF | 0% | itself |
Most alike: LIC MF Nifty Midcap 100 ETF and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | LIC MF Nifty Midcap 100 ETF | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 28% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 63% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Nikhil Kapoor · 5 mo | Nishit Patel · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.0% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 7.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −21.2% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹679 Cr | ₹44,570 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.6 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 102 · 23% | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.