Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential Nifty50 Value 20 Index | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 Index | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Nifty50 Value 20 Index | itself | 57% |
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 Index | 57% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential Nifty50 Value 20 Index Fund and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 Index Fund share 57% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Nifty50 Value 20 Index | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 Index |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Index Funds | Index Funds |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 46% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.43% | 0.33% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 86% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Nishit Patel · 2.6 yrs | Nishit Patel · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −9.1% | −6.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 6.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 6.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.6% | −15.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹101 Cr | ₹17,420 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.6 yrs | 10 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 22 · 78% | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.