Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Motilal Oswal Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal Large Cap | itself | 54% |
| Nippon India Large Cap | 54% | itself |
Most alike: Motilal Oswal Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 54% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Motilal Oswal Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Large Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 73% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.40% | 1.01% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 70% | 57% |
| Run by P7 | Ajay Khandelwal · 2.6 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs |
| 1-year return | −3.3% | −4.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 11.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.8% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3,189 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.7 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 56 · 45% | 69 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.