Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| WhiteOak Capital Large & Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| WhiteOak Capital Large & Mid Cap | itself | 20% |
| ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap | 20% | itself |
Most alike: WhiteOak Capital Large & Mid Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap Fund share 20% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | WhiteOak Capital Large & Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.75% | 1.03% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 89% | 113% |
| Run by P7 | Piyush Baranwal · 2.8 yrs | Gaurav Jain · 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 4.7% | 0.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 15.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 14.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.0% | −14.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹2,498 Cr | ₹33,351 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.7 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 130 · 30% | 123 · 31% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.