Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Sectoral/ Thematic fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Pharma and Healthcare | HDFC Defence | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Pharma and HealthcareSectoral/ Thematic | itself | HDFC Pharma and Healthcare and HDFC Defence share 0% of their portfolios | HDFC Pharma and Healthcare and ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services share 0% of their portfolios |
| HDFC DefenceSectoral/ Thematic | HDFC Defence and HDFC Pharma and Healthcare share 0% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Defence and ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services share 0% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial ServicesSectoral/ Thematic | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services and HDFC Pharma and Healthcare share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services and HDFC Defence share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, HDFC Pharma and Healthcare Fund and HDFC Defence Fund, share 0% — not one holding in common. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Pharma and Healthcare | HDFC Defence | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 100% of 4 | 35% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.56% points | 1.53% points | 1.08% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 80% | 59% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Antariksha Banerjee · 7 mo |
| 1-year return | 28.6% | 22.4% | −2.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 32.4% | 38.2% | 9.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — | 9.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.9% | −34.5% | −17.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3,142 Cr | ₹11,252 Cr | ₹11,267 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.4 yrs | 2.4 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 49% | 26 · 80% | 59 · 63% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.