Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI BSE SENSEX ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | itself | 16% |
| SBI BSE SENSEX ETF | 16% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 16% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI BSE SENSEX ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 2 | 21% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 44% | 31% |
| Run by P7 | Nishit Patel · 3.1 yrs | Viral Chhadva · 7 mo |
| 1-year return | −5.3% | −8.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | −50.2% | 5.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 6.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −90.3% | −16.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹143 Cr | ₹1.22 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.1 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 32 · 47% | 32 · 64% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.