ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • quant BFSI FundSectoral/ Thematic×
  • HDFC Manufacturing FundSectoral/ Thematic×
  • SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES FUNDSectoral/ Thematic×
  • ICICI Prudential Technology FundSectoral/ Thematic×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherquant BFSIHDFC ManufacturingSBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICESICICI Prudential Technology
quant BFSISectoral/ Thematic
itself
quant BFSI and HDFC Manufacturing share 0% of their portfolios
quant BFSI and SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES share 6% of their portfolios
quant BFSI and ICICI Prudential Technology share 0% of their portfolios
HDFC ManufacturingSectoral/ Thematic
HDFC Manufacturing and quant BFSI share 0% of their portfolios
itself
HDFC Manufacturing and SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES share 0% of their portfolios
HDFC Manufacturing and ICICI Prudential Technology share 1% of their portfolios
SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICESSectoral/ Thematic
SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES and quant BFSI share 6% of their portfolios
SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES and HDFC Manufacturing share 0% of their portfolios
itself
SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES and ICICI Prudential Technology share 1% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential TechnologySectoral/ Thematic
ICICI Prudential Technology and quant BFSI share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Technology and HDFC Manufacturing share 1% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Technology and SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES share 1% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, quant BFSI Fund and SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES FUND, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

Measurequant BFSIHDFC ManufacturingSBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICESICICI Prudential Technology
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
Fund housequant Money Managers LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4100% of 4not measured61% of 10358% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.98% points1.14% points1.21% points0.98% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1230%59%132%61%
Run by P7Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrsnot knownMilind Agrawal · ≥ 3 moVaibhav Dusad · 6.3 yrs
1-year return16.9%7.0%1.0%−12.1%
3 years p.a.22.9%—15.8%5.3%
5 years p.a.——12.5%3.4%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−22.3%−21.5%−16.1%−28.0%
Assets (AUM)₹899 Cr₹10,759 Cr₹10,879 Cr₹13,677 Cr
Disclosed history3.1 yrs2.3 yrs5.8 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight28 · 95%94 · 34%39 · 68%71 · 54%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.