Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Sectoral/ Thematic fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | quant BFSI | ICICI Prudential Technology | SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES |
|---|---|---|---|
| quant BFSISectoral/ Thematic | itself | quant BFSI and ICICI Prudential Technology share 0% of their portfolios | quant BFSI and SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES share 6% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential TechnologySectoral/ Thematic | ICICI Prudential Technology and quant BFSI share 0% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Technology and SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES share 1% of their portfolios |
| SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICESSectoral/ Thematic | SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES and quant BFSI share 6% of their portfolios | SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES and ICICI Prudential Technology share 1% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, quant BFSI Fund and SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES FUND, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | quant BFSI | ICICI Prudential Technology | SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 4 | 58% of 109 | 61% of 103 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.98% points | 0.98% points | 1.21% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 230% | 61% | 132% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Vaibhav Dusad · 6.3 yrs | Milind Agrawal · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 16.9% | −12.1% | 1.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 22.9% | 5.3% | 15.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 3.4% | 12.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.3% | −28.0% | −16.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹899 Cr | ₹13,677 Cr | ₹10,879 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.1 yrs | 13 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 28 · 95% | 71 · 54% | 39 · 68% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.