Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mirae Asset Silver ETF | UTI Silver Exchange Traded | |
|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Silver ETF | itself | 0% |
| UTI Silver Exchange Traded | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Mirae Asset Silver ETF and UTI Silver Exchange Traded Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Silver ETF | UTI Silver Exchange Traded |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Silver ETF | Silver ETF |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 4 | 0% of 6 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Ritesh Patel · 3.3 yrs | Ayush Jain · 1.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 74.9% | 75.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 46.5% | 46.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −44.4% | −43.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,192 Cr | ₹729 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.3 yrs | 3.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 2 · 100% | 2 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.