Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI Long Term | ICICI Prudential Long Term | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI Long Term | itself | 15% |
| ICICI Prudential Long Term | 15% | itself |
Most alike: UTI Long Term Fund and ICICI Prudential Long Term Fund share 15% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Long Term | ICICI Prudential Long Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Long Term | Long Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 7 | 100% of 14 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.97% | 0.70% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Pankaj Pathak · 10 mo | Manish Banthia · 2.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 2.4% | 2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 5.5% | 6.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 5.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −5.7% | −3.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹69 Cr | ₹843 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.5 yrs | 1 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 7 · 100% | 21 · 87% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.