ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • HSBC Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value×
  • UTI Value FundValue×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherHSBC ValueNippon India Growth Mid CapICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)UTI Value
HSBC ValueValue
itself
HSBC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios
HSBC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 27% of their portfolios
HSBC Value and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HSBC Value share 15% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and UTI Value share 13% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HSBC Value share 27% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value share 42% of their portfolios
UTI ValueValue
UTI Value and HSBC Value share 30% of their portfolios
UTI Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios
UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 42% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value Fund share 42% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureHSBC ValueNippon India Growth Mid CapICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)UTI Value
CategoryValueMid CapValueValue
Fund houseHSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd.Nippon Life India Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4100% of 1187% of 10968% of 10937% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.12% points0.86% points0.83% points0.79% points
Portfolio turned over a year P175%52%58%47%
Run by P7Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrsRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsDharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrsAmit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs
1-year return2.4%7.0%−5.4%−4.1%
3 years p.a.15.9%18.6%11.5%12.1%
5 years p.a.—18.0%13.5%11.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−19.6%−19.9%−14.0%−17.2%
Assets (AUM)₹15,373 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹60,800 Cr₹9,603 Cr
Disclosed history3.8 yrs14 yrs13 yrs12 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight86 · 32%105 · 25%66 · 52%71 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.