Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| NJ Arbitrage | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage | |
|---|---|---|
| NJ Arbitrage | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Arbitrage | 0% | itself |
Most alike: NJ Arbitrage Fund and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | NJ Arbitrage | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Arbitrage | Arbitrage |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 14 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.74% | 0.60% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 128% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Nikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.3% | 6.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 6.8% | 7.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 6.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.7% | −0.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹270 Cr | ₹34,536 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 10 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 205 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.