Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| BARODA BNP PARIBAS CONSERVATIVE HYBRID | ICICI Prudential Conservative Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| BARODA BNP PARIBAS CONSERVATIVE HYBRID | itself | 9% |
| ICICI Prudential Conservative Hybrid | 9% | itself |
Most alike: BARODA BNP PARIBAS CONSERVATIVE HYBRID FUND and ICICI Prudential Conservative Hybrid Fund share 9% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | BARODA BNP PARIBAS CONSERVATIVE HYBRID | ICICI Prudential Conservative Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Conservative Hybrid | Conservative Hybrid |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 84% of 19 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.61% | 0.83% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 22% | 2% |
| Run by P7 | Gurvinder · 1.7 yrs | Manish Banthia · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | 5.1% | 3.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.6% | 8.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 8.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −3.2% | −3.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹943 Cr | ₹3,355 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.3 yrs | 2 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 107 · 32% | 137 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.