Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Kotak Nifty 100 Low Volatility 30 ETF | SBI Nifty 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Kotak Nifty 100 Low Volatility 30 ETF | itself | 0% |
| SBI Nifty 50 ETF | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Kotak Nifty 100 Low Volatility 30 ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Nifty 100 Low Volatility 30 ETF | SBI Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 19 | 2% of 99 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 32% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Viral Chhadva · 7 mo |
| 1-year return | −4.3% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 9.7% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.1% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹192 Cr | ₹2.14 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.