Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI MultiCap | Kotak Flexi Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBI MultiCapMulti Cap | itself | SBI MultiCap and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | SBI MultiCap and UTI Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and SBI MultiCap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | Kotak Flexi Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and SBI MultiCap share 19% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself |
Closest pair: SBI MultiCap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 19% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Flexi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI MultiCap | Kotak Flexi Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Flexi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 19 | 45% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.00% points | 1.09% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 85% | not measured | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Bectors Food · ≥ 3 mo | not known | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −0.6% | −1.6% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 13.3% | 11.5% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 10.6% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.1% | −16.3% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹24,138 Cr | ₹54,857 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.7 yrs | — | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 72 · 30% | none disclosed | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.