Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI MultiCap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Tata Value | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBI MultiCapMulti Cap | itself | SBI MultiCap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios | SBI MultiCap and Tata Value share 14% of their portfolios | SBI MultiCap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI MultiCap share 15% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 19% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and SBI MultiCap share 14% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and SBI MultiCap share 15% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Tata Value share 9% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund share 19% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI MultiCap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Tata Value | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 19 | 87% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.00% points | 0.86% points | 1.15% points | 1.03% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 85% | 52% | 81% | 108% |
| Run by P7 | Bectors Food · ≥ 3 mo | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | −0.6% | 7.0% | 0.2% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 13.3% | 18.6% | 12.9% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 18.0% | 13.3% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.1% | −19.9% | −20.9% | −17.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹24,138 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.7 yrs | 14 yrs | 11 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 72 · 30% | 105 · 25% | 41 · 52% | 167 · 24% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.