ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Silver ETFOther ETFs×
  • ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFOther ETFs×
  • ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETFOther ETFs×
  • SBI Nifty 50 ETFOther ETFs×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India Silver ETFICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETFSBI Nifty 50 ETF
Nippon India Silver ETFOther ETFs
itself
Nippon India Silver ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 0% of their portfolios
Nippon India Silver ETF and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 0% of their portfolios
Nippon India Silver ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFOther ETFs
ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 83% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 83% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETFOther ETFs
ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 83% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 100% of their portfolios
SBI Nifty 50 ETFOther ETFs
SBI Nifty 50 ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios
SBI Nifty 50 ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 83% of their portfolios
SBI Nifty 50 ETF and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 100% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 100% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India Silver ETFICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETFSBI Nifty 50 ETF
CategoryOther ETFsOther ETFsOther ETFsOther ETFs
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedSBI Funds Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P485% of 2045% of 10928% of 1092% of 99
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured31%32%32%
Run by P7Vikram Dhawan · 4.5 yrsNishit Patel · 5.7 yrsNishit Patel · 5.7 yrsViral Chhadva · 7 mo
1-year return74.8%−8.0%−6.1%−6.1%
3 years p.a.46.3%5.3%7.1%7.0%
5 years p.a.—6.1%7.1%7.1%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−44.4%−16.1%−15.4%−15.4%
Assets (AUM)₹30,898 Cr₹32,675 Cr₹44,570 Cr₹2.14 lakh Cr
Disclosed history4.6 yrs10 yrs12 yrs5.8 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight4 · 100%32 · 64%52 · 53%52 · 53%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.