ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

3 of 6 chosen

  • Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)Arbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×
  • HDFC Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Tata Arbitrage FundArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)HDFC ArbitrageTata Arbitrage
Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)Arbitrage
itself
Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) and HDFC Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)
Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) and Tata Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)
HDFC ArbitrageArbitrage
HDFC Arbitrage and Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)
itself
HDFC Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
Tata ArbitrageArbitrage
Tata Arbitrage and Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)
Tata Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, HDFC Arbitrage Fund and Tata Arbitrage Fund, share -0%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)HDFC ArbitrageTata Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseSundaram Asset Management Company LtdHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedTata Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P40% of 2128% of 109100% of 58
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.72% points0.53% points0.82% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured117%263%
Run by P7Dwijendra Srivastava · ≥ 2.0 yrsnot knownSailesh Jain · ≥ 1.3 yrs
1-year return6.8%6.7%6.8%
3 years p.a.7.3%7.3%7.5%
5 years p.a.—6.7%6.9%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.5%−0.5%−0.4%
Assets (AUM)₹600 Cr₹25,229 Cr₹24,426 Cr
Disclosed history—2.4 yrs1.3 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed191 · 39%212 · 52%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.