ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

3 of 6 chosen

  • Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)Arbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×
  • ICICI Prudential Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • SBI Arbitrage FundArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)ICICI Prudential ArbitrageSBI Arbitrage
Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)Arbitrage
itself
Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)
Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) and SBI Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)
ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)
itself
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios
SBI ArbitrageArbitrage
SBI Arbitrage and Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)
SBI Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Arbitrage Fund and SBI Arbitrage Fund share 56% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)ICICI Prudential ArbitrageSBI Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseSundaram Asset Management Company LtdICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedSBI Funds Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P40% of 21100% of 10938% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.72% points0.60% pointsnot measured
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured128%98%
Run by P7Dwijendra Srivastava · ≥ 2.0 yrsNikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrsArdhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 mo
1-year return6.8%6.7%6.5%
3 years p.a.7.3%7.3%7.3%
5 years p.a.—6.7%6.9%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.5%−0.4%−0.5%
Assets (AUM)₹600 Cr₹34,536 Cr₹38,447 Cr
Disclosed history—10 yrs5.8 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed205 · 41%208 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.