Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Arbitrage fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) | SBI Arbitrage | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund)Arbitrage | itself | Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) and SBI Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) | Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) |
| SBI ArbitrageArbitrage | SBI Arbitrage and Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) | itself | SBI Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: SBI Arbitrage Fund and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage Fund share 56% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Sundaram Arbitrage Fund(Formerly Known as Prinicpal Arbitrage Fund) | SBI Arbitrage | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Arbitrage | Arbitrage | Arbitrage |
| Fund house | Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd | SBI Funds Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 21 | 38% of 109 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.72% points | not measured | 0.60% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 98% | 128% |
| Run by P7 | Dwijendra Srivastava · ≥ 2.0 yrs | Ardhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 mo | Nikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.8% | 6.5% | 6.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.3% | 7.3% | 7.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.5% | −0.5% | −0.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹600 Cr | ₹38,447 Cr | ₹34,536 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 5.8 yrs | 10 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 208 · 41% | 205 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.