Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| NJ Balanced Advantage | ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| NJ Balanced Advantage | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage | 0% | itself |
Most alike: NJ Balanced Advantage Fund and ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | NJ Balanced Advantage | ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dynamic Asset Allocation or Balanced Advantage | Dynamic Asset Allocation or Balanced Advantage |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 4% of 23 | 86% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.39% | 0.93% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 42% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Manish Banthia · 17 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.2% | 3.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.4% | 11.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 10.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.8% | −8.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3,413 Cr | ₹75,356 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 239 · 35% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.