ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Kotak Multi Cap FundMulti Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Tata Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • ICICI Prudential Multi Cap FundMulti Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherKotak Multi CapTata ValueNippon India Small CapICICI Prudential Multi Cap
Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap
itself
Kotak Multi Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Tata ValueValue
Tata Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself
Tata Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios
Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios
Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap
Nippon India Small Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Nippon India Small Cap and Tata Value share 5% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 16% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap
ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Tata Value share 9% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Small Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund share 16% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureKotak Multi CapTata ValueNippon India Small CapICICI Prudential Multi Cap
CategoryMulti CapValueSmall CapMulti Cap
Fund houseKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Tata Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4100% of 2463% of 10990% of 10949% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.62% points1.15% points1.10% points1.03% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured81%68%108%
Run by P7not knownSonam Udasi · ≥ 9 moSamir Rachh · 9.6 yrsLalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs
1-year return4.2%0.2%8.9%6.8%
3 years p.a.17.3%12.9%16.1%15.9%
5 years p.a.—13.3%19.0%15.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−21.0%−20.9%−24.2%−17.3%
Assets (AUM)₹25,937 Cr₹8,440 Cr₹76,236 Cr₹19,305 Cr
Disclosed history—11 yrs14 yrs11 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed41 · 52%257 · 16%167 · 24%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.