Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF | Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of | |
|---|---|---|
| HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF | itself | 0% |
| Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of | 0% | itself |
Most alike: HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF and Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF | Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Overseas | FoF Overseas |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 24 | 67% of 43 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.53% | 1.17% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | 25.5% | 17.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 25.9% | 31.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 16.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.1% | −31.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,738 Cr | ₹4,133 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 7 · 100% | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.