Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Axis NIFTY India Consumption ETF | Mirae Asset Nifty 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Axis NIFTY India Consumption ETF | itself | 26% |
| Mirae Asset Nifty 50 ETF | 26% | itself |
Most alike: Axis NIFTY India Consumption ETF and Mirae Asset Nifty 50 ETF share 26% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Axis NIFTY India Consumption ETF | Mirae Asset Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Equity ETF | Equity ETF |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 25 | 66% of 59 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 32% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Ekta Gala & · 5.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | −7.5% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.2% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −21.9% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹13 Cr | ₹5,527 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.7 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 32 · 60% | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.