Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Tata Floating Interest Rates | ICICI Prudential Floating Interest Rates | |
|---|---|---|
| Tata Floating Interest Rates | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Floating Interest Rates | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Tata Floating Interest Rates Fund and ICICI Prudential Floating Interest Rates Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Floating Interest Rates | ICICI Prudential Floating Interest Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Floating Interest Rates | Floating Interest Rates |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 19% of 27 | 99% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.46% | 0.91% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Akhil Mittal · ≥ 9 mo | Darshil Dedhia · 3.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.5% | 7.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.8% | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.4% | −0.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹122 Cr | ₹9,100 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 7.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 93 · 28% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.