Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ ETF | Mirae Asset Hang Seng TECH ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ ETF | itself | 0% |
| Mirae Asset Hang Seng TECH ETF | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ ETF and Mirae Asset Hang Seng TECH ETF share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ ETF | Mirae Asset Hang Seng TECH ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | ETFs investing overseas | ETFs investing overseas |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Siddharth Srivastava · 5.4 yrs | Siddharth Srivastava · 4.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 24.7% | −23.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 42.9% | 10.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 27.8% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −27.5% | −30.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3,820 Cr | ₹377 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | 4.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 12 · 100% | 32 · 72% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.