Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Kotak US Specific Equity Passive FOF | Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore | |
|---|---|---|
| Kotak US Specific Equity Passive FOF | itself | 0% |
| Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Kotak US Specific Equity Passive FOF and Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak US Specific Equity Passive FOF | Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Overseas | FoF Overseas |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 32 | 42% of 83 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.47% | 1.02% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | 30.4% | 24.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 32.0% | 25.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 20.9% | 6.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −23.4% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹4,327 Cr | ₹3,116 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.