Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Invesco India - Invesco Global Consumer Trends Fund of | Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of | |
|---|---|---|
| Invesco India - Invesco Global Consumer Trends Fund of | itself | 0% |
| Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Invesco India - Invesco Global Consumer Trends Fund of Fund and Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Invesco India - Invesco Global Consumer Trends Fund of | Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Overseas | FoF Overseas |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 35% of 34 | 67% of 43 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.02% | 1.17% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Sagar Gandhi · ≥ 1 mo | not known |
| 1-year return | −4.1% | 17.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 23.7% | 31.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.1% | 16.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −32.6% | −31.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹568 Cr | ₹4,133 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 3 · 100% | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.