Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ITI Banking & PSU Debt | Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking & PSU Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| ITI Banking & PSU Debt | itself | 4% |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking & PSU Debt | 4% | itself |
Most alike: ITI Banking & PSU Debt Fund and Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking & PSU Debt Fund share 4% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ITI Banking & PSU Debt | Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking & PSU Debt |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Banking and PSU | Banking and PSU |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 50% of 36 | 38% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Laukik Bagwe · 1.6 yrs | Harshil Suvarnkar · ≥ 6 mo |
| 1-year return | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.4% | 6.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.4% | −0.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹34 Cr | ₹8,855 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 16 · 89% | 202 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.